Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Hierarchic Scaling

Kevin Gallagher
Professor Porter
ENGL 4420
Final Project

 
In the thread I created, I tried to cluster all the poems in which a sense hierarchic scaling can be observed via form, comparison, and order/location of content. By scaling I mean, as the OED defines, “the measurement or estimation of quantities. … measurement or grading of attributes,” and further “to measure or represent… according to an arbitrary defined scale,” (OED online). I think the poems I’ve selected deal with reconfiguring (assignment and assessment of) the value of various nouns within scales of size, location and power. In a way this blogpost will operate similar to the notion of fractal dimension, which is a ratio that compares how details in pattern (though generally speaking of fractal patterns) changes with the scale it is measured in. This isn’t to be confused with fractal poetry though. The sense of scaling and ordering of nouns creates a sort of hierarchy, in which the scaling method used to describe a noun is suggestive of not just its location, geographically, but location in a hierarchy, and thus its value. The scaling that occurs seems to function in two modes: micro and macro. Micro means scaling things narrowly, or with great specificity/definition, while macro scales things in very generalize, grand terms. In some cases poems may stick to one mode or alter between the two, but the mode doesn’t suggest value, only the location in the hierarchy does.  I think writing about nature spontaneously evokes scaling, as nature contains an incomprehensively wide range of size:
 Additionally, nature poetry tends to use scales of nature as sources to draw comparisons that comment on aspects of existence, such as duty, purpose, place, futility, uniqueness, and ubiquity.  Samuel Taylor Coleridge has that “In the several classes and orders that mark the scale of organic nature, from the plant to the highest order of animals, each higher implies a lower as the condition of its actual existence;” (189). Similarly, in the case of the poems themselves, location of a noun in the hierarchy reveal the conditions of existing in that location, in which value can be derived.
            Probably the first poem I thought of when considering hierarchic scaling was Feld’s “Little Viral Song.” I originally thought of this poem because the poem’s scale can be thought of geographically, on the macro scale:

“So the sad pile of chicken flesh
In West Timor and Bangladesh
Gave us that certain, sad frisson
One feels near the apocalypse.”

The use of specific locations primarily operates as a “far away,” and foreign/alien; tts ‘sad chicken’ a reflection of how we perceive their state of living as less civilized than our own. The poem continues to create a sense of distance/difference in the second stanza:

“As the infection zeros in
From the East, one feels jaundiced.
The end would come from that direction.”

The certainty of the East as the source of the seemingly apocalyptic virus reinforces the westerner’s attitude, privileging his surroundings over the East’s. Scaling the East on the macro level, creates a hierarchy of location, and considering the distance created, the East seems to sit near the bottom of the hierarchy while, as we’ll seen in the following stanzas, the more localized setting of the speaker is placed much higher, in that it is favored and less abstract, I think this is ultimately reflective of the west’s jingoist values, as further implied by the third stanza, which continues:

“The end will come from that direction
One is already inclined
Toward. In suburban Maryland,
The epicenter of my mind,
The die-off of the crows and ravens
Made me think: even here? in Kensington?”

Here the scaling is made a bit more micro, away from the East, specifically locating the setting in Kensington, favored in that is “the epicenter of my mind,” and that he questions if such a virus could even make it there. In regards to the hierarchy established, Kensington is at the top, while the further away you get from Kensington the lower it gets.

However it is in the fourth and fifth stanza that the hierarchy is revealed to be built around the self of the speaker, in that he privileges what is closest to him, stating:

“And even here in Washington
State, we watch them shivering
…
So long the great winged migration”

and later in the fifth stanza:

“So long the great winged migration:
Now harbinger, instead
Of spectacle of the world’s renewal.
What should the likes of us do,
Crawling between toilet and bed?
And there are other worse, symptoms.”

Relocating the scale around the speaker and favoring the appeals of the self and surroundings locates them as values near the top of the poem’s hierarchy which insists our value of egocentrism. We get caught up “crawling between toilet and bed,” more concerned for ourselves now that the virus is  creating conditions that negatively affect the values near the top of our hierarchy. When the virus was far away it was out of mind, and no need of turning into a sensation, even the toll on birds we seem less affected than thought of being potentially infected ourselves.

The second poem I picked is Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s “The Blessed Damozel,” because the poem shares a similar geographic scale, though the scale ranges from Earth to Heaven. Additionally the method of creating scale can be observed in the form as well as the content of the poem. The poem initiates the scale in the very first stanza, locating the damozel in Heaven:

“The blessed damozel lean’d out
From the gold bar of heaven”

Meter wise, (the second stanza being an exception) the poem maintains iambic trimeter on the first, third, and fifth line of every stanza. The poem’s only regular rhyme scheme is according to vowel sound on every second, fourth, and sixth line of each stanza.

 
Scaling, as a means of measurement can also create a sense of distance. I think the distance that Rossetti wanted to emphasize between Heaven and Earth is insisted by the difference in construction of the alternating lines. Though, considering lines 1-2, 3-4, 11-12, 13-14, 21-22, Rossetti uses enjambment to establish a connection between the alternating lines. In doing so, I don’t think that the speaker is favoring Heaven or Earth; which is interesting because as paradise, Heaven is one of the ultimate concerns of a Christian’s faith, it’s strange to not privilege Heaven over Earth. Though I do believe the damozel is favored, or rather her appearance is, being that the enjambed lines of the first four stanzas are all about describing the damozel beautifully, for example lines 3-4 and 11-12 respectively: “Her eyes were deeper than the depth / Of waters still’d at even;” and “Her hair that lay along her back / Was yellow like ripe corn.” and etc.


The third poem I picked, offers the most obvious sense of hierarchy and scale, that being Milton’s Paradise Lost, and its clear distinctions of Heaven, Earth and Hell, ranked accordingly. In the selections from book 4 that we read, Satan pines for the top tier of Heaven and approaches paradise. The depictions of paradise are clearly preferred, being described as a “circling row / Of goodliest trees loaden with fairest fruit” (lines 147-148). Clean air and “perfumes” emanate from the garden. Eden is clearly the closest thing to Heaven on Earth as possible; the distinction is made clearer by the overgrown thicket that protects the garden.

“Yet higher then thir tops
The verdurous wall of paradise up sprung:
Which to our general Sire gave prospect large
Into his neather Empire neighbouring round.”

 The garden is valued so much that it is guarded so heavily and highly from the rest of Earth, and especially Hell. The fact that Satan must breach the garden further insists the distance of Hell and Heaven, and conflating the bottom of the hierarchy with top presents a problem. According to Kristin McColgan in Abundant Gifts: Hie http://www.rossettiarchive.org/img/s244.fogg.jpgrarchy and Reciprocity in “Paradise Lost,” states that Milton “envisions a universe based on … hierarchy, that according to John T. Shawcross, ‘has allowed [Milton] to be a spokesperson for… diametrically opposing causes” (76). Though, generally for the rest of the book hierarchy of gender dynamics is what is what mostly observed.

I think the distinction of differences, whether by distance, concept, or form, help construct a hierarchy of values that reveal conditions or certain aspect of the poems that are preferred or privileged over others. The distinction of differences are made by establishing a scale that allows measurements to be made that provide locations to place in the hierarchy that ultimately determine values. These scales arbitrarily applied according to the content of the poem, but provide new lenses to for perception.

references:

Abundant Gifts: Hierarchy and Reciprocity in "Paradise Lost"
Kristin Pruitt McColgan

"scale, v.3." OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2015. Web. 13 May 2015.


Levere, Trevor Harvey. Poetry Realized in Nature: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Early Nineteenth-century Science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment