After researching
context, similar to Rebecca in her post, Percy Shelley never saw the statue
since the statute of never lasted nor did its inscription so it becomes apparent
that Shelley wrote this inspired by hearsay rather than seeing it visually
himself. I bring this up because his sonnet opens up with “I met a traveler” in
the first line then quickly shifts to the traveler’s perspective, “Who said: Two
vast and trunkless legs of stone …” in the second line. I think this transition
is reflective of how this poem was inspired. So instead of the speaker (Shelley)
giving a description the narrative is actually produced via the traveler. The perspective of the traveler that the poem
assumes for the remaining lines approaches the statue like he is on foreign
land “Two vast and
trunkless legs of stone /Stand in the desert . . . Near them, on the sand, /Half
sunk, …” He describes the statue as if it’s a first experience because the
person he is telling to has never experienced it it seems. The ellipsis in the third line seems like a
little jump or a fragment in a stream of consciousness occurs during the
description. Perhaps this fragmentation is representative of the fragmented, “trunkless
legs of stone”
No comments:
Post a Comment